Case Study

Medical Device Wire Harness: MRI-Compatible Cable Assembly

How we designed and manufactured wire harnesses for a Class II medical imaging device—navigating FDA compliance, EMI challenges, and biocompatibility requirements.

Hommer ZhaoAugust 20, 202410 min read

Device Class

Class II

Harness Count

12 unique

Annual Volume

500 units

Project Duration

8 months

The Challenge

Our customer, a medical device manufacturer, was developing a new patient monitoring system for use in MRI environments. The device required multiple wire harnesses connecting sensors, displays, and power systems—all while operating within the intense electromagnetic field of an MRI scanner.

Key Technical Challenges

MRI Compatibility

All materials must be non-ferromagnetic

EMI Immunity

Function reliably in extreme RF environment

Patient Safety

No heating, no induced currents near patient

Biocompatibility

Patient-contact cables require ISO 10993

Cleanability

Withstand hospital disinfection protocols

Documentation

Full DHF for FDA 510(k) submission

Our Approach

1. Material Selection

Standard copper and steel components were out. We worked with our materials team to identify MRI-safe alternatives for every component:

ComponentStandard MaterialMRI-Safe Alternative
ConductorsTinned copperCopper (acceptable) or carbon fiber (near patient)
ShieldingBraided steelCopper braid with non-magnetic drain
ConnectorsNickel-plated brassPlastic housings, gold-plated copper contacts
FastenersSteel screwsTitanium or PEEK plastic

2. EMI/RF Filtering

MRI scanners generate extremely powerful RF pulses. Cables act as antennas, potentially corrupting signals or inducing dangerous currents. Our solution:

  • RF filters at every cable entry point to the device enclosure
  • Twisted pair construction for all signal cables (common mode rejection)
  • Double-shielded cables for analog sensor signals
  • Fiber optic links for longest runs (complete galvanic isolation)

3. Safety Engineering

Patient safety is paramount. We implemented multiple safeguards:

Heating Prevention

Looped cables can act as inductors in RF fields, generating heat. We specified cable lengths to avoid resonance at MRI frequencies and added thermal fuses.

Current Limiting

High-impedance designs and current-limiting resistors prevent induced currents from reaching dangerous levels even under fault conditions.

Regulatory Compliance

Medical device harnesses aren't just about electrical function—they require comprehensive documentation for regulatory approval.

StandardScopeOur Deliverables
IEC 60601-1Electrical safetyInsulation testing, creepage/clearance analysis
IEC 60601-1-2EMC requirementsShielding specs, filter design documentation
ISO 10993BiocompatibilityMaterial certs for patient-contact cables
ISO 13485Quality managementFull production documentation, traceability
21 CFR 820FDA QSRDHF contribution, production records

"The documentation took as long as the engineering. But that's medical devices—you're not just proving the harness works, you're proving you have a controlled process that will produce identical harnesses every time. We built the quality system alongside the product."

HZ

Hommer Zhao

Project Manager

Results

Project Outcomes

  • FDA 510(k) clearance achieved first submission
  • Zero field failures in first 18 months of production
  • Full MRI compatibility verified at 1.5T and 3T
  • Production ramped from prototype to 500/year on schedule

Technical Achievements

  • Signal integrity maintained in 3T MRI environment
  • Patient-contact cables passed ISO 10993 cytotoxicity
  • 100% lot traceability for all components
  • Cleaning validation for hospital disinfectants

Lessons Learned

Start material qualification early

MRI-compatible alternatives have longer lead times. We lost 6 weeks waiting for specialty connectors that could have been ordered during design.

Test in the real environment

Bench EMC testing didn't reveal all the issues we found in actual MRI scanners. Budget for scanner access early in the project.

Document as you go

Trying to reconstruct design decisions for the DHF after the fact is painful. Capture rationale in real-time.

Engage regulatory early

The FDA predicate device search and gap analysis should happen before detailed design, not after.

Related Resources

HZ

About the Author

Hommer Zhao led this medical device project from initial consultation through FDA clearance. He specializes in regulated industry harness development, having supported medical, aerospace, and automotive programs requiring comprehensive documentation and quality systems.

Discuss Your Medical Project

Have a Medical Device Harness Project?

Our team has experience with Class I, II, and III medical devices. Let's discuss your requirements and regulatory pathway.